Category: Uncategorized

  • R2893 JOSEPH THE MERCIFUL

    [R2893: page 327]       

    JOSEPH THE MERCIFUL. GEN. 45:1-15.—

    “Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.”—Rom. 12:21.

    DIVINE PROVIDENCE in the affairs of men is the essence of this lesson. Joseph was now thirty-nine years of age, having been next to Pharaoh in the throne of Egypt for nine years. [Gen. 41:46-47; 45:6] The seven years of plenty were in the past [Gen. 41:47]; the granaries of Egypt were full with enough to spare, and two years of the predicted famine were already past [Gen. 45:6]. It would seem that Joseph had made no attempt to communicate with his father and brethren; first, probably because the methods of communication at that time were limited, but more particularly, we opine, because he had for some years been realizing that divine providence was shaping his affairs. He remembered his early dreams, and could see that they were now in a fair way of fulfilment. He would leave to divine supervision this matter, which was evidently beyond his control anyway. He no doubt thought of the famine, and how it would affect Palestine, and thus the interests of his father and brethren, their households, flocks and herds. He no doubt expected that as other people from the vicinity were coming to Egypt to buy grain, so quite probably eventually the Hebrews would come also; and they were forced to come by the close of the second year of the famine.

    We may surmise that some law prohibited the sale of grain to foreigners, except by the chief ruler’s permission, and that thus Joseph’s brethren were obliged to come before him to explain. This thought is sustained by the fact that Joseph, wishing to try his brethren, first cast them into prison as spies—as though they were emissaries of a foreign power; which perceived the wealth of Egypt in food, and was meditating an attack upon the country. This gave Joseph the opportunity of inquiring minutely respecting the home conditions of his brethren, concerning his father and Benjamin, his younger brother, who was not with the brethren. Finally, he gave them the opportunity of proving the truth of their statements, holding Simeon as a ransom until they would come again and bring Benjamin with them, knowing full well that they would be obliged to do this, because the famine would continue. These experiences proved a valuable lesson to the ten brethren, respecting the difficulties in which they were, and called to mind their past wrong conduct in respect to Joseph, for they accepted their present difficulties as retribution. “They said one to another, we are verily guilty concerning our brother, in that we saw the anguish of his soul when he besought us, and we would not hear, therefore is this distress come upon us. And Reuben answered them, saying, Spake I not unto you, saying, do not sin against the child; —and ye would not hear? Therefore, behold also his blood is required. And they knew not that Joseph understood them; for he spake unto them by an interpreter.” [Gen. 42:21-23]

    Joseph was not hard-hearted, but wise in his treatment of his brethren. Most evidently not a solitary act was inspired by vindictiveness. He was evidently taking God’s view of matters; viz., that it is proper that a certain amount of retribution shall come upon evil-doers, so as to impress upon them the more thoroughly the sinfulness of sin. Thus parents and guardians of children should not permit their kindness and sympathy to hinder a reasonable, moderate punishment of wrong-doing. Nevertheless, pity and love should be back of all, as it was in Joseph’s case; merely planning for the better opportunity and the larger amount of blessing in due time.

    When their grain was exhausted, and want was staring them in the face, Jacob finally consented to let Benjamin go with his brethren for the second purchase of grain; not, however, until Judah had become pledge for Benjamin, that he would not return to his home or family unless Benjamin also returned. The coming of the brethren to Joseph’s house a second time, with the proof of the genuineness of their original story, was sufficient ground for their entertainment most graciously, and for the liberation of Simeon; —the whole company, to their surprise, being invited to dine with the governor, Joseph. They were surprised, too, that by some preconcerted arrangement they were seated at the table in the order of their ages; and further astonished that their younger brother, Benjamin, received five portions, as an evidence of special regard of the governor. They were rejoiced, undoubtedly, at the good fortune that had overtaken them, and making ready started on their homeward journey, doubtless thinking to themselves—We thought that our hardships of the previous time were probably in the nature of retributions, and that God’s hand was in it, but after all, it seems that it was merely a natural thing that we should be taken for spies. Now, behold, we are prospered.

    But they had not gone far until they were overtaken by the governor’s agents, who represented that a theft had been committed, that the governor’s valuable silver mug, called by the Egyptians, “Cup of Divination,” was missing. They protested their innocence, that they were not that kind of men, and suggested that they be searched thoroughly. Examination was made of the grain sacks of one after another, until finally the cup was found in Benjamin’s sack, and the whole company, previously elated, now returned prisoners to the governor of Egypt, whose hospitalities they had so recently enjoyed, and apparently had so poorly requited. Perhaps they began to think about the Joseph matter again, and to say to themselves, the evil that we thought was past is still pursuing us. It was a good lesson undoubtedly, helping to impress upon their minds, not only the value of honesty, but also the thought that although the wheels of justice grind sometimes slowly, they grind surely and very fine.

    Benjamin, with the rest, denied that he had stolen the cup, and whether the brothers believed him or not, they would not lay special blame upon him, but generously shared it as a whole company. Judah, speaking for them, said, “What shall we say unto my Lord? What shall we speak, or how shall we clear ourselves? God has found out the iniquities of thy servants. Behold, we are my Lord’s servants, both we and he also with whom the cup was found.” [Gen. 44:16] They did not explain to Joseph the nature of their iniquity, though this evidently was in their minds. Joseph, however, wishing to see to what extent they had still the same evil, jealous disposition which they manifested toward him, proposed to let the others go free and merely to hold Benjamin, as the slave. The ruse [or trick] was successful, and developed the fact that the brethren had learned lessons and formed characters in the interim which made them now more sympathetic one for another, and for their father. Their wrong course in Joseph’s case had not been persisted in, but had been repented of. Judah explained the whole situation to Joseph through the interpreter, and so vividly did he picture Jacob’s love for Benjamin, and his sorrow at the supposed death of Joseph, and the interest of the whole family in their father, that Joseph could no longer refrain—could no longer restrain his emotions. [Gen. 45:1a] He felt that the time had now come to reveal himself to his brethren, and in order that they might feel the less embarrassed under the circumstances he ordered all the Egyptians from the room [to go outside], and then explained briefly and sympathetically that he himself was their brother Joseph.

    What wonder that the brethren were troubled, as they thought probably of how they would be disposed to retaliate were they in his place of power. But Joseph soon convinced them that he had none but kindly feelings for them, that he was merciful, forgiving. The spirit which he exhibited under these circumstances is worthy of emulation, not merely by natural men, but also by the “new creatures in Christ Jesus.” [Similar 2 Cor. 5:17] How often do we find that the Lord’s people are narrow in such matters, instead of being broad and generous, loving and forgiving? Joseph now speaking to his brethren in the Hebrew tongue, repeated to them the words, “I am Joseph,” and added, “whom ye sold into Egypt,” [Gen. 45:3-4] that thus they might recognize him, not only by his speech, but by his knowledge of the facts, that it was really their brother who was before them. But this expression was so gracious, and anger and malice were so absent from his every word and act, that they were inspired with confidence, and at his request drew near to him.

    Many Christians would have spoiled the whole effect of this great lesson upon their brethren had they been in Joseph’s place, by poor judgment, by reading the brethren a lecture; —by telling them what they already knew about the wrong of their conduct, about how now they were in his power, and how he could evil entreat them, but would not. Joseph was too wise and too merciful to take such a course. He took the contrary one, saying, “Be not grieved nor angry with yourselves that ye sold me hither.” [Gen. 45:5] It seems wonderful indeed that a natural man could and would have so much of the spirit of God as is here manifested, [A]and yet we know that Joseph was only a natural man—the holy spirit not having been poured out upon any of our race until Pentecost. It gives also a suggestion respecting the breadth of character of the ancients, quite in contradiction of the theory of evolution, which would claim that at that early period, man being but slightly above the monkey, would have coarse and brutish sentiments.

    Joseph preached a great sermon to his brethren in few words, when he said, “God did send me before you to preserve life” [Gen. 45:5b]—he thus overruled your wrong course, and has brought out of it a blessing. He gave his brethren credit for ability to understand such things. That the Lord overruled their course for good, did not prove that their course was a good or proper course; it merely proved the divine power and the divine wisdom and divine providence, that was over Joseph and over all the house of Jacob, causing all things, even the evil thing, to work out for good, according to the divine plan.How great and how lasting a lesson came to Joseph’s brethren through their experiences, and through this his short sermon we cannot tell; but there is a great lesson here for all of God’s people today along the line of mercy toward those who deliberately sin against us; and also along the line of noting, discerning and referring to divine providence in connection with our affairs. We are not only to note divine providences, but we are to give credit for them, as it is written, “In all thy ways acknowledge him.” Prov. 3:6.

    Joseph could have permitted his experiences to have developed a great deal of personal pride. He might have reasoned to himself, as some would have reasoned, that he was merely lucky, or that he was naturally bright, attractive, smart, and that this was the secret of his success; that this was the reason his father loved him specially; that this was the reason, when sold for a slave, he was bought by a good master in affluent circumstances; that this personal brilliancy was the cause of his rise in Potiphar’s house to eminence; that the same effected his rise to a position of authority in the prison; that his keenness of intellect had enabled him to interpret the dreams; and that in general he stood head and shoulders above other men; and that others realized this, and hence he had come by his exaltation in a natural way. But had he thus been heady and high-minded, and self-conceited, we may be sure that it would have led to a fall—that God would not have continued to bless, prosper and advance him. We may be sure, too, that had he thus developed a spirit of pride and self-conceit, his conduct with his brethren would have been very different from what it was. He would have been crowing over them, and mistreating them in order to convince them of his power, and thus would have shown himself to be a very much smaller man than his proper course shows him to have been. He was a great man, and his greatness was manifested, not merely in his financial management of the kingdom of Egypt, but especially manifested in his reliance upon God, his realization that the divine promise and blessing, through his great-grandfather, Abraham, his grandfather, Isaac, and his father, Jacob, was resting upon him in some manner, and that because of this divine favor, things were working as they were.

    The spiritual [or the promised true] seed of Abraham may draw valuable lessons from this narrative. If it was appropriate that Joseph should acknowledge the Lord as the giver of all his blessings, which were all of an earthly and temporal kind, how much more should the spiritual [or promised] Seed of Abraham acknowledge the spiritual blessings received at the Father’s hand, —and recognize in every mercy and favor opportunities of service; that it is the hand of providence. Surely these should always be on the alert, to realize and to confess, —”It is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes.” [Psa. 118:23] But on the contrary, we are sorry at times to find some of God’s spiritual children inclined to be puffed up, and to speak of God’s favor, the knowledge of the truth which they have received of the Lord, as though it were something of their own achievement; —as though some honor were due them, as the inventors of the divine plan.

    Again, the spiritual Israelite should be even more merciful than Joseph. If he could see that the persecutions he receives, from his brethren and others, are merely incidents of divine providence—which the Lord is using to prepare him for coming blessings and exaltation, should not the spiritual Israelite take his disappointments as God’s appointments? And should he not with a clearer eye of faith, be the better able to see that many of his spiritual advancements have come as a result of persecutions from the world and from false brethren? And should he not, like Joseph, look with great complacency upon all these various agencies which God has been pleased to use in spiritually uplifting him, to perfect him as a “new creature,” an heir of God, a joint-heir with Jesus Christ, his Lord? He surely should. And the only things which can hinder us from seeing that our advancement is of the Lord, and not of ourselves, will be a lack of humility, and a lack of trust in divine providence; and the only things which could hinder us from feeling patient forbearance and kindly sympathy and love for those who have despitefully used and persecuted us, would be a lack of the spirit of the Lord, the spirit of mercy, and a failure to see properly that whatever agencies God may use in our spiritual up building are to be appreciated and sympathized with;—whether they be brethren or of the world—Egyptians.

    Then Joseph explained the providence of God, the years of plenty and the years of famine, and how God had been supervising the entire matter, and that this was his means of preserving Abraham’s posterity, concluding, “So now, it was not you that sent me hither, but God.” [Gen. 45:8a] We are not to give credit to the evil agencies through which we have received blessings, otherwise we might soon be disposed to call evil good; but we are to give full credit to God, because that which was intended to be evil, and which was evil of itself, divine wisdom, so far above the earthly plane, was able to overrule for our good. It is as we learn the lesson of God’s inherent goodness—as we learn to respect his wisdom, love and power that our faith grows stronger and stronger, until we are able to trust the Lord, not only in things which we can see are working out for our good, but able to trust him also in respect to things which seem entirely dark and out of which apparently no good can come; thus we trust him where we cannot trace him. And this is faith; and faith is a gift of God in that it is cultivated to acceptable development by the Lord’s gracious promises, rightly received, appreciated and acted upon.

    While Joseph had patiently waited for the Lord’s time to come, and for twenty [or precisely twenty-two] years had not seen his father’s face [Gen. 37;2,28; Gen. 41:53; 45:6], having now witnessed the fulfillment of his first dream, the bowing of his brother’s sheaves to his sheaf, he realized that the Lord’s time had about come for him again to see his father, when the second dream would be fulfilled. And whereas he was all patience before, now he was all energy and haste, because the time was come, and so he said to his brethren, “Haste ye, and go up to my father, and say unto him, thus saith thy son Joseph, God hath made me lord of all Egypt. Come down unto me; tarry not.” [Gen. 45:9] He impressed upon his brethren the glories of his position, not by way of boast or pride, but by way of assuring them of his authority and power to care for them, and so that they might fully assure their father Jacob that his caution might not hinder him from taking advantage of the goodly land of Goshen, now put at their disposal. His brethren and father were not invited to come and share in his throne and regal power, but were invited to come and partake of all the blessings flowing therefrom. Just so during the Millennial age, after the Christ, Head and Body, represented in Joseph shall be in the throne of glory and of power—in the heavenly Father’s throne—when the Kingdom of God shall be established in the earth, all who feel a famine, a hunger, for the true bread of heaven, for eternal life, will be invited to come and receive abundantly of it. None, however, of the earthly class will be invited to share in the [reigning] Kingdom honors, for the Kingdom class will be complete. But they will be invited to come and receive the blessings of the Kingdom, mental, moral and physical, health and strength, under the favor of the King of kings and Lord of lords.

    The parting of Joseph and his brethren was an affecting one; they now understood the meaning of their previous experiences, including the cup found in Benjamin’s sack; they saw that these matters all were leading up to the present manifestation to them of the love and sympathy of Joseph, and now, as expressing his special love for Benjamin he kissed him first, weeping tears of joy and recognition, and then did to all the others similarly, and sent them on their way. There is power in affection, in love; but it is necessary that the loving affection be manifested, ere that power can be felt. A difficulty with many parents, husbands, wives, children, is that they do not manifest all the affection which they feel. Pride or fear or some other thing hinders, restrains them, from being as frank with each other as they should be. Joseph’s example here is worthy of emulation. He was the wronged one; he was the one in power; he was the one who should have the dignity, and he, therefore, was the one who could best afford to humble himself, and to kiss and make an ado over his brethren. We may be sure that they appreciated it; that such a manifestation of affection on the part of the highly exalted brother touched a tender spot in their hearts, and doubtless worked good for them to the remainder of their lives. And so we may find it with our friends and relatives, that a manifestation of our love and kind feeling toward them will not only be reciprocated, but will do them good; and that our affection restrained of expression will leave an icy coldness, which nothing else will remove, and that such coldness will affect not only them but ourselves also unfavorably—sapping all of life’s joy-springs.

    Let us remember, in this connection, the words of our text, “Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.” [Rom. 12:21] Joseph exemplified this advice. He not only did not permit the evil course of his brethren to overcome him, and make him evil and bitter, but he overcame their evil tendencies, characters and dispositions by his love, his mercy, his kindness, his generosity, —affecting them favorably, no doubt, for the remainder of their days. Such a course is much more incumbent upon us than upon Joseph. He did it spontaneously; we have had the example and precepts of our Lord and his Apostles, and, as well, the begetting of the spirit of holiness. “What manner of persons ought we to be in all holy living and God-likeness?” [2 Pet. 3:11]

    ====================

    Good subject.

  • R5000 BEWARE OF PRIDE IN THE HEART

    [R5000 : page 110]

    BEWARE OF PRIDE IN THE HEART

    “Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the Lord.”—Prov. 16:5.

    PRIDE IS VERY DECEITFUL and frequently cloaks or covers itself with humility. Because of our own imperfections it is well for us not to become judges of others [hearts or intentions], but merely limit our judgment to the outward manifestations. The Lord says, “By their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matt. 7:20.) We are to judge the outward conduct, but we cannot go beyond and say what is of the heart. Errors of [outward] judgment are not an abomination to the Lord. He may look upon mistakes with sympathetic eyes. People are not responsible for those qualities which have come down to them by inheritance. Without judging individuals we may see certain conduct sometimes which may seem to be pride, yet is not pride.

    We have seen people who have a great lack of self-esteem, a great lack of vanity, but who may have large approbativeness [ambition or desires]. They do not think so much of themselves as they wish others to think of them. They say, “If people knew me as I know myself, I would simply be a cypher in the world.” There is a certain amount of truth in this. People with small self-esteem are often taken to be proud, when it is really not the case. In trying to look as though they were somebody they will carry themselves as though they thought they were everybody. Such persons are simply laboring in an unfavorable condition in which they were born. We cannot think that the Lord would abominate them. They are very often little to themselves and very humble with the Lord. Yet they try to make themselves appear in as favorable a manner as possible. We must admit that there is a propriety [or correctness] in this to a certain extent. It is wise for them to try to overcome their weaknesses of nature. They should try to think soberly of themselves (that is, to be of sound mind), and they should try not to overdo matters. They must act with meekness, as well as feel and think meekly.

    There is another class who have a large amount of self-esteem, yet who think, “I do not wish others to know that I have this high opinion of myself, therefore I will cloak it. I will endeavor to speak very humbly. The Scriptures say that we should be humble, therefore when I speak of anything I will try to speak from this standpoint.” Such people very frequently get a gloss of humility of an outward kind. Some people really think that this course is right. If they are sincere in their conduct, we cannot suppose that the Lord would abhor them.

    Our thought, then, is that in this text “The proud in heart” [Prov. 16:5a] are the haughty-minded—those who feel haughty toward others and are not sympathetic, who think of themselves more highly than they ought to think, who despise others. The heart of such a one is not that which God could love or that anyone could love; it is an abomination in the Lord’s sight.

    WHY PRIDE IS AN ABOMINABLE TRAIT

    An abomination is that which is extremely displeasing—that which is repulsive—that which a person should not wish to entertain—should not harbor—must reprove. There must be some reason why God declares Himself thus in opposition to pride. We perceive that no one really has anything whereof to be proud. As the Apostle [Paul] suggests in one place (I Cor. 4:7), “What hast thou that thou didst not receive? Now, if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not received it?” What have we that we have not received of the Lord? If whatever we have received is a gift, where is our right to be proud of it? Evidently, such would be a very wrong condition of mind to be in—to be proud of things not our own, not of ourselves, but a gift.

    There is, therefore, no reason for any to be proud; but there is every reason to be thankful to the Great Giver of all good. [Read Jas. 1:17] And that which is true of us is true also of the angels. Hence, there is nothing in all the Universe for any of God’s creatures to be proud of. Whatever conditions they are in are not of themselves. God seems to have arranged the conditions for humility, so that there could be no ground for pride.

    Pride is merely selfishness, self-laudation; and selfishness is another name for sin. Sin and selfishness, therefore, are in opposition to the Divine Character and the Divine Plan—totally in opposition to it. It is, therefore, the right and proper thing that God should have the proud in detestation [or hate]. Not having used His blessings aright, they could not have His favor. Whether they be proud of mental attainments, proud of physical strength, proud of wealth or ancestry, or proud that their “ancestors were monkeys,” matters not. It is all pride, and an abomination to the Lord.

    THE MOST DETESTABLE FORM OF PRIDE

    But evidently the most detestable form of pride is pride in the Church—as though we had made the Plan and could boast in it! We do, indeed, see that anyone making the Plan might justly feel proud of it. But when we remember that none of us made the Plan, but that we are privileged to see it, we should be filled the more with humility, and should try day by day to better glorify His Name for the blessings which He has provided for the whole world.

    We cannot suppose that any kind of pride would be more detestable in God’s sight than pride of the Truth. If anyone should continue in such a course, manifestly it would lead him out of the light. We see this principle illustrated well in the case of Satan. Noble, grand, he allowed pride to enter his heart [A]and said, “I will ascend above the others; I will have an empire of my own.” And this pride made him the opponent of God. (Isa. 14:12-17.) He is known in the Scriptures as the Adversary, Satan, the Devil.

    All those who have the spirit of pride fail to recognize that “every good and perfect gift cometh down from the Father of Lights.” (Jas. 1:17.) Every such one, therefore, has the spirit of the Adversary instead of the Spirit of God. If it be allowed to grow and bring forth fruit, it will lead eventually to the Second Death. It is appalling to see the nature of the temptations that come to God’s people! But we are not to judge their hearts, to determine whether it is a pride of heart or not; for it may be merely a deception for a time. And even though they may miss the “high calling,” [Phil. 3:14] they may get a place in the “great company.” [or great multitude Rev. 7:9] And when we see that the conduct is not at all in accord with what we should expect in those blessed with the Truth, it should make us all search our own hearts to see to what extent we have the same traits of pride. [Matt. 7:3-5]

    Perhaps this quality of pride is nowhere more manifested than in some of those who have been in the Truth for quite a while. Sometimes it is on the part of the sisters. Sometimes they are very proud of what they know and very domineering in their manner, seeming to think that they know it all. Sometimes it is on the part of the brethren, in whom a spirit of pride appears. They have been placed as Elders. They see that they themselves are right and others are wrong. Sometimes this leads to an attempt to override the liberties of the congregation and to hold power in their own hands.

    “BE NOT MANY TEACHERS” [Similar Jas. 3:1]

    It may not always be our privilege to mention such a matter. Such things may be matters that belong to a class. But, as one Pilgrim brother remarked some time ago, “Brother Russell, I sometimes think that, when we get beyond the veil, we shall be astonished to find how few of those who have exercised positions of prominence in the Church will be amongst the [glorified] elect.” It behooves us all who are associated in the Lord’s work to watch ourselves closely, that if we find the slightest tendency in this direction of pride we may stamp it out as we would some contagious disease, knowing what the effects are upon others. We should be sympathetic with those who are beset, but not with the difficulty. We are reminded of the Apostle’s [James’] words, “Be not many teachers, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.” [Similar Jas. 3:1] Those who have seen the Truth clearly and have some talents and opportunities will have the severer trial on that account.

    Recently we have heard of some trials in the Class Extension work. The opportunities of Class Extension have resulted, in some cases, not advantageously. Some of great self-esteem have felt that they should be in the work, determining that they would tell the Class what to do. Some good brethren may have done this; some noble men may have done it. But in doing it, they were not acting wisely, we believe.

    As we said at first, it is not well for us to judge the heart. Everyone is privileged to preach as he may have opportunity. He may go forth entirely at his own expense and opportunity. He may preach all that he can. Good men have done so. There is nothing in the Scriptures to prohibit it. But to try to coerce a Class—trying to recognize the Class in some sense and to ignore that Class in another sense—is not the right thing. If the Class is supposed to express the Divine will, the individuals should acquiesce in what the Class decides.

    ====

    Good subject.

  • NOAH TO ABRAHAM Part 3 – Bro. David Rice

    NOAH TO ABRAHAM [Part 3] – By Bro. David Rice

    This is part three of our series on Bible Chronology.

    In the first we explained that 6000 years from Adam expire with the year 2043 AD, marking this as the beginning of the grand, promised Millennium of Revelation chapter 20. During that Millennium Satan will be bound “so that he can deceive the nations no more” (verse 2) [Rev. 20:2], freeing the world of his deceptions. Then everyone, worldwide, will come to a knowledge of the Truth. God “will have all men to be saved, and to come to a knowledge of the truth” (1 Timothy 2:4).

    During the present Gospel Age, which lasts from our Lord’s death until the Millennium, God has not been converting the world — if that were his objective, then it surely would have been accomplished [Read Isa. 55:11]. Rather, His objective during this age has been to select from among the world an elect class, the “Church of the firstborn” (Hebrews 12:23), elsewhere termed a “Bride” for Jesus (John 3:29, Revelation 19:7, 21:2), composed of the 144,000 described in Revelation 14:1.

    But soon the Millennium will come. If it begins, as we understand from the Scriptures, in the year 2043 AD, then we have but 24 [or now 18] years to that blessed time. However, that age will be born through final, severe spasms of trouble, and those distresses will take time to fade away. It may take some time for various nations to receive that Kingdom. Our confidence in the time of these expectations is founded on the record of years contained in the sacred text of the Old Testament. Here is a brief summary, to remind the reader.

    SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS

    The first part of this summary — the years from Adam to the end of the Flood — was discussed in detail in our previous issue. This article considers the next portion, from the Flood to God’s Covenant with Abraham.

    GENESIS CHAPTER 11

    The history of this time begins in Genesis chapter 11. Verse 10 [Gen. 11:10] says Shem begat Arphaxad two years after the flood. [A]As mentioned in the closing note of our previous article, in a genealogy, “begat” refers to the birth of a son. Here is a list of generations beginning with Arphaxad, through Terah, the father of Abraham.

    At the death of Terah Abraham left Haran for Canaan and received the Covenant from God at Shechem. The LORD appeared unto Abram (his name had not yet been changed to Abraham) [Name change from Gen. 17:5], and said, unto thy seed will I give this land: and there builded he an altar unto the LORD, who appeared unto him (see Genesis 12:1-7). Stephen mentioned this during his trial recorded in Acts chapter seven. He says Abraham “came … out of the land of the Chaldean’s, and dwelt in Charran: and from thence, when his father was dead, he removed him into this land (Israel). And … he promised that he would give it to him for a possession, and to his seed after him, when as yet he had no child” (Acts 7:4, 5).

    THE AGE OF ABRAHAM

    At this time “Abram was seventy-five years old … and into the land of Canaan they came” (Genesis 12:4, 5). This means that Abraham was born when his father Terah was 130 years of age (205 – 75 = 130). Some are confused by this because Genesis 11:26 says “Terah lived seventy years, and begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran”, listing Abram first. However, this text [Gen. 11:26] is not giving the birth order of Terah’s sons. It lists Abraham first because of his importance in the record, for he was the one favoured by God. In this it is similar to Genesis 5:32, which lists the sons of Noah. “Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.” This lists Shem first because of his importance, for he was the ancestor of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the Israelites. But Shem was not the eldest. We know this, because Genesis 11:10 says Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, whereas Noah’s first son was more than 100 at the time. (For Noah was 500 years old 100 years before the flood.)

    THE TIME SINCE ADAM

    Since there were 1656 years from Adam to the end of the Flood, and 427 years thereafter until God’s Covenant with Abraham, the sum of these years gives us 2083 years from Adam to the Covenant.

    TO THE EXODUS

    Moses led the Exodus, and then mediated the Law, at about the same time (there were only a few weeks in between). In Galatians 3:16, 17, Paul says the Law came 430 years after God’s covenant with Abraham. “The covenant that was confirmed before of God (to Abraham) … the Law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul” [Gal. 3:17] … It seems clear that Paul separates the two covenants by 430 years.

    How did Paul know this, living so many years after the fact? He secured the number of years from Exodus 12:40, 41, where 430 years is mentioned twice. [B]We will discuss this text in our next issue. Here we only note that it is the source for Paul’s remarks in Galatians.

    This means from Adam to the Exodus and the giving of the Law was 2513 years after the creation of Adam (2083 + 430 = 2513).

    TO THE TEMPLE

    1 Kings 6:1 tells us that the founding of Solomon’s Temple began in the 480th year after the Exodus. “And it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month Zif, which is the second month, that he began to build the house of the LORD.”

    The second month, Zif, is the one which followed Abib, later called Nisan, in the spring time. The Exodus began in the middle of Abib, so it also occurred in the spring of the year. One complete year after the Exodus brings us to the 2nd year … 479 complete years after the Exodus bring us to the 480th year.

    [C]This means from Adam to the founding of the Temple was 2992 years (2513 + 479 = 2922 [or rather 2992]). Adding this number of years backward, from the date of Solomon’s founding of the Temple (966 BC), we arrive at 3958 BC as the year of Adam’s Creation. 6000 years from there forward brings us to 2043 AD (6000 – 3958 BC = 2042, plus one to adjust for crossing the BC / AD divide, yields 2043 AD for the close of 6000 years from Adam).

    Pause a moment. Note that at each step, the scriptures provide the necessary information to connect the chain of testimony and count of years, from the remote beginning of our race in father Adam, to historical times. This count of years could easily have lapsed at any time — as it does in the history of every people, other than the Hebrews, God’s chosen people.

    Thus God has supplied what we have in no other way, namely a means of counting the years from Adam to our day. Why this particularity and care? That we have this remarkable testimony suggests a value to it, leading us to the grand Seventh Millennium, toward which the Plan of God is building for a grand climax. (See chart below.)

    It is our privilege, as the Lord’s children, to look into the deep things of His word, and secure from it a prospect for the fruition of our hopes in the near future. “Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants” (Amos 3:7).

    ANOTHER ENGAGING SYMMETRY

    Before we close, let us observe another engaging feature about this material. The feature here introduced is one of symmetry. It begins with the passing of the Old World at the opening of the Flood. Because the Flood episode consumed one year (and a few days), the date opening the flood was 2303 BC.

    From there until the Exodus and giving of God’s Law to Israel was 858 years. That also marked the end of an Old World — Israel’s bondage to Egypt and its Pharaoh.

    Now the point of symmetry. If we advance from the Exodus forward another 858 years, one arrives at the date 587 BC. [D]As mentioned in the Daniel article earlier in this issue, that was the date of the end of the Kingdom of Judah. There Zedekiah lost his throne, Jerusalem was sacked, its people removed to Babylon, and the temple burned.

    God brought that kingdom to an end because of the wickedness of the leaders and the people, just as he brought the Old World to a close, and the rule of Pharaoh over Israel to a close. Note the illustration above, showing this symmetry.

    It seems the Lord is giving us evidence of design and thoughtful arrangement in the time periods composing His Plan of the Ages. The various stages of God’s Plan did not occur randomly, but as we might expect of the brilliance of the Divine Mind, there is an underlying order and symmetry. By observing this, our confidence is deepened that we have apprehended the evidence of scripture correctly about these periods of time, which lead us, ultimately, to the establishment of Christ’s Millennial Kingdom.

    This symmetry is elegant. But is it too simple? Might it be coincidence? In our next issue we will augment this diagram, to show how it extends both backward and forward, in an expanded symmetry. Line upon line, precept upon precept, feature by feature, let us absorb each portion in sequence.

    – By Br. David Rice – From Faithbuilders Fellowship, January 2006.

    ——————-

    Good chronology subject.

  • BIBLE CHRONOLOGY Part 2 – Bro. David Rice

    BIBLE CHRONOLOGY [Part 2] – By Bro. David Rice

    [A]Our last issue carried an article titled “When Comes the Kingdom?”, pointing to the scriptural evidence that the Kingdom is near, not quite four decades [now two decades] ahead. In one sense, of course, the Kingdom [that is, its setting up] is already beginning, in that our Lord’s return as a divine invisible spirit being, with regal authority, has already commenced. According to the prophecy of the 1335 years of Daniel 12:12, our Lord’s Parousia commenced during the year 1874. There began the Harvest of the present Gospel Age. There commenced the seventh trumpet of Revelation 11:15, which brings the announcement that the Kingdom of this world has become the Kingdom of our Lord (Jehovah) and of his Christ (his anointed son, Jesus Christ); and he shall reign for ever and ever.

    The verses following this announcement speak of the judgments of God which stir the anger of the nations, as they are buffeted and riven [or divided] with wars and uprisings. The effect of these have been evident in two world wars and the subsequent conflicts within and between nations world-wide. World War I began in 1914, forty years after our Lord’s second advent. Thus for forty years the judgments were held in abeyance [or suspension], just as following our Lord’s first advent in 29 AD, the judgments against the nation of Israel were in abeyance for forty years.

    Jesus is now a conquering king. But when we speak of the Kingdom near at hand, we mean the time when Christ’s Kingdom is established on the earth as a governing force among men. This awaits the end of the present Gospel Age Harvest. Then, when the Church is complete and the high calling of God in Christ Jesus is completed, that Kingdom will begin to operate in Israel under the resurrected Ancient Worthies [or heroes of faith] of old. Gradually its influence and authority will spread worldwide. That will be the long anticipated Millennium. During that time the saints shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years (Revelation 20:6).

    As explained in last issue’s article, that Millennium will be the seventh millennium since Adam. According to the record of years given in the Old Testament, 6000 years from Adam will close with the year 2043 AD, just 38 [now 18] years ahead. If this understanding be correct, we are very near to the climax of our hopes.

    “THY KINGDOM COME” [Third Volume Title; Matt. 6:10a]

    As most of our readers know, Pastor Charles Russell authored a series of six volumes collectively titled Studies in the Scriptures, which contain the essence of Present Truth for the establishment of the faith of the saints. We highly recommend this series of studies for all who have a thirst for the deep things of God.

    The third volume of this series was titled Thy Kingdom Come. Its opening chapter explains in reverent tones, but with a lofty, exhilarating spirit, the grandeur of our day at the very threshold of the glorious Kingdom so near. Here is the opening page of that volume.

    [B]The most momentous event of earth’s history is the establishment of God’s Kingdom among men, in the hands of our Lord Jesus and his selected joint-heirs, the overcomers of the Gospel Church. This great event, toward which, as shown in previous volumes of Scripture Studies, all of God’s promises and types point, we now see to be not only at hand, but just upon us. None of those awake to these facts, and who properly or even partially realize them, and whose hearts are in full sympathy with God’s great plan of the ages, and who see that God’s panacea [or remedy] for the sin and misery and dying of the groaning creation is to be applied by this Kingdom, can possibly feel other than an absorbing interest in the fact, the time and the manner of its establishment.

    “All who trust implicitly for the fulfillment of the prayer our Lord himself taught us to offer, “Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven” [Matt. 6:10]– must feel the liveliest interest in the fulfillment of their request, if they prayed from the heart — in spirit and in truth.

    “We can see that even the world, if it could but realize the true character of this Kingdom, would hail it at once, as they finally will, as the long sought blessing, bringing with it the precious favours of the golden Millennial age, so long desired.

    OUR SENTIMENTS

    This expresses our sentiments, exactly. The time has been delayed since these words were penned. But all the while we have been advancing to the time of the promised Kingdom. The light now shining on the Divine Word shows that the words our Lord spoke to the Jews of his day can be used again This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled (Matthew 24:34).

    The count of years from Adam was explained in our last issue. We now propose to examine each portion of time in depth. Those who wish to know something of the time of that kingdom will surely be interested in how the Scriptures shed light on our way toward that blessed time.

    ADAM TO THE FLOOD

    From Adam until the end of the Flood was a period of 1656 years. The source of this information is Genesis, beginning with chapter five. There we have the age of Adam when his son Seth was born, namely 130 years, and the age of Seth when his son Enos was born, namely 105 years, and so on, generation by generation, until Noah. At the bottom of page 11 is a list of these generations, with each text of scripture supplied. (You can find the same list in Studies in the Scriptures, Volume 2, titled The Time is at Hand, page 43).

    Only the scriptures give us this reliable and unbroken testimony of the earliest times. By this means our Heavenly Father has supplied information without which we could not know the times and seasons which are in His power.

    To guard against possible slips for example transcription errors which are possible in any record of digits and numbers we have an internal check on the integrity of each value. For example, for Adam, Genesis 5:3-5 says, And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth; And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: And all the time that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died. {*The word begat is used repeatedly in the common version of our English translation. Modern translations clarify the meaning, such as the New American Standard Version, which says became the father of. The Hebrew word is yalad, which according to Strong’s Concordance means to bear young: causative, to beget. Thus it can refer either to birth or begettal, but it seems clear in the context, and is generally conceded, that in these genealogies the time of birth is referred to, rather than the begettal nine months earlier.}

    Thus the passage gives us the years until the birth of Seth, the years following the birth of Seth, and the sum of these years. By this means any error in the record would become immediately apparent, and a correction could immediately be made, thus ensuring the preservation of the information. The same formula is given for the other patriarchs as well.

    THE END OF THE FLOOD

    Sometimes there is confusion about exactly how to reckon the closing 600 years listed below. The flood episode lasted just over a year from beginning to end. The rains began in the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month (Genesis 7:11), and the band of eight survivors left the ark the following year in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month (Genesis 8:14).

    The 600th year referred to means 600 complete years had not yet passed. The conclusion of that year came later, and in fact the very first day of the next year numbered 601 is explicitly mentioned in the Genesis account. And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth (Genesis 8:13). Thus we conclude that the 600 years closed near the end of their flood experience. In other words, there were 1655 years until the flood, and 1656 years until the flood end.

    CALENDAR YEARS

    The method of dating experiences in the flood is by year, month, and day, each numbered and reported. The flood began on the 17th day of the second month of year 600. [Gen. 7:11] The years mentioned are the years of Noah’s life. But how were they reckoned?

    They seem to be calendar years, because of the mention of numbered months and days. They do not seem to count from Noah’s birthday, as we reckon ages of people today for example. Presumably all of the years mentioned in the genealogy are of the same kind of reckoning, that is, calendar years.

    This is consistent with the way reigns of kings of nations such as ancient Israel, Babylon and Assyria were reckoned. Calendar years were used, so that the number of the years of a king’s reign was incremented on the first day of a new year. It was not counted from the day he came to the throne, which could be any time during the year when the previous king died.

    Possibly some era of years counted from the beginning and ran consecutively until the flood. But if this was so, there is no record of it in Genesis. The absence of such an era in the text suggests it was not the common practice, for if it were, such a convenient and widely used system would probably have been noted when dating the events in the flood narrative.

    But with such long-lived patriarchs as lived before the flood, there was a readymade method for accounting long periods of time in any given family, by numbering years according to the years of the patriarchs not just for the line from Adam to Noah, but for any family line. In this case, to avoid a duplicate number assigned to any given year, thus confusing the count over several generations, an easy custom could be used. When a child was born, simply count that year as the year of his birth. His year numbered one would commence on the following new year day.

    By this method, when the record says of Lamech, the father of Noah, that he lived 182 years to the birth of his son Noah, the year of that birth would be counted as 182 of Lamech. The year following would be numbered 183 Lamech and 1 Noah, the next 184 Lamech and 2 Noah, etc. Over several generations, one could compute an accurate sum of years by merely adding the years reported in the genealogy as we have them in Genesis chapter 5 or any genealogy various families may have kept before the flood.

    But, was it so? The inference that it was is supported by examining the record of Methuselah, who incidentally was the longest living man in the record. Methuselah lived 187 years to the birth of Lamech, Lamech 182 years to the birth of Noah, and Noah 600 years until the end of the flood. The sum of these is 969 the same as the lifespan of Methuselah. But this sum of years takes us to the end of the flood. How could Methuselah live to the end of the flood, since he was not on the ark?

    Using the calendar system above, it does work. The year 969 of Methuselah would be the year in which he died. That would be the same calendar year which began a month and seventeen days before the flood. Evidently Methuselah died, very old even by the standards of that day, in the opening weeks of the year the flood came.

    On the other hand, if ages were counted in ancient times the way we count ages today that is, from one birthday to another, the years of one’s age incrementing only after that complete number of years had passed then Methuselah would necessarily have died in year 601 of Noah. This would be impossible, since it would mean he survived the flood, which no one did except the eight occupants of the ark.

    What is the point of this? It is that the sum of years listed above, from Adam to the close of the flood, yields an accurate span of years from Creation to the Flood.

    AN ENGAGING OBSERVATION

    Brethren of the Bible Student fellowship are familiar with the period of 1845 years, which spans the distance between the first advent of our Lord Jesus, when he was baptized by John at Jordan in 29 AD, and the second advent of Jesus, at the end of the 1335 years of Daniel 12:12 in 1874. This period of time has been discussed by generations of Bible Students.

    Notice that from Adam until the Old World passed away at the opening of the Flood was a period of 1655 years. The sum of these two numbers 1655 and 1845 is exactly 3500. In other words, from the end of the Old World, 1845 years forward bring us exactly to the year which is the mid-point of God’s plan of 7000 years.

    It is generally supposed that this 7000-year period is the seventh of the seven creative days mentioned in Genesis chapter one. Each of those days was termed an evening and morning. True to this reckoning, even the Jewish days counted by Israel commenced in the evening, and half way through the 24 hours of any given day appeared the morning.

    Is it then a coincidence that from the passing of the Old World, this well-known prophetic time span of 1845 years brings us exactly to the opening of a new beginning in God’s plan of the Ages, the morning of God’s rest day, during which all the blessings God intends for His human creation will come to fruition?

    As observed in our previous issue, that mid-point marks the very year commencing the seventy-week prophecy of Daniel’s ninth chapter [Dan. 9:24], leading to the redemption, and all the blessings which flow from it.

    This is an example of the kind of symmetry and order we encounter time and again when the count of years is established from Scripture. This is an evidence for our faith that we are discerning the mind of God in these issues. It is lovely to behold. In the next issue we will consider the next link in the chain of Bible Chronology, namely, the 427 years from the end of the Flood to God’s Covenant with father Abraham.

    – By Br. David Rice – From Faithbuilders Fellowship, December 2005.

                                                               _______________

    Good subject.

  • R5148 WHAT CONSTITUTES PURITY OF HEART

    [R5148 : page 389]

    WHAT CONSTITUTES PURITY OF HEART

    “Blessed are the pure in heart; for they shall see God.”—Matt. 5:8.

    THE WORD pure is a comprehensive term, meaning without adulteration, sincere, unsullied. Purity of heart is purity of motive, of intention, of effort, of will—purity in the sense of transparency, of truthfulness. In other words, Blessed are the honest-hearted—those who have absolutely right intentions. The word heart in this text [Matt. 5:8] does not refer to the organ which pumps the blood throughout the system, but to the intention, the will of the man.

    In his creation, man was made in the image of God, and so was originally pure in heart—honest, sincere, truthful, perfect in intention; but by reason of the fall from his natural condition, sin and selfishness have developed in his heart, and the Godlike qualities given him in his creation have been to a considerable degree obliterated. While there are many worldly people who to some extent might claim honesty of heart, yet only those who have given themselves to God in full consecration can belong to the class which shall see Him.

    When one has made a full consecration of himself and has been begotten by the Holy Spirit, he is said to have a new heart, a new will, new ambitions, new desires. Where the conversion from sin to righteousness is thorough, it may be truthfully said, “Old things have passed away; behold, all things are become new.” (2 Cor. 5:17.) To accomplish so radical a change requires the operation of a powerful influence—that of the Holy Spirit.

    Purity of thought, however, does not mean absolute perfection of thought, word and deed. To this condition no member of the fallen race can attain until the beneficent influences of the Kingdom shall have restored the race to its original perfection. But to will right, to will perfectly, to be pure in heart, is quite possible; indeed, it is very necessary to all who desire Divine approval. The standard set before us, to which our hearts, our wills, must give assent, is the Divine Standard, “Be ye perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.”—Matt. 5:48.

    As long as we are in the flesh, we are obliged to think, to speak and to act through the imperfect medium of the fallen body, whose affections are continually in opposition to the new will and must be resisted. Therefore, to perform all that the new will would prompt is sometimes beyond the ability of the Lord’s most earnest followers: and all have need that the merit of Christ covers their blemishes, so that the new will, the new heart, may be judged of the Lord and tested as to its worthiness or unworthiness of eternal life and the attendant blessings which God has promised to the overcomer.

    Only the pure in heart have the promise of seeing God. These continue faithful to the end of their pilgrimage; and not only do they attain the character-likeness of the Lord Jesus in their purity of heart intention toward all, but eventually they shall be made like Him and “see Him as He is,” in the glorious change of the First Resurrection.—I John 3:2.

    HONORABLE MOTIVES INDICATIVE OF HEART PURITY

    When one finds imperfection in himself, when he discovers that he is not up to the glorious standard of righteousness set forth in the Scriptures, when he realizes that he comes short of the glory of God, then it becomes his privilege to seek to amend his conduct. [A]The very act of deciding to do right is the beginning of the process by which one gets a new [or transforming] mind, a new will. [B]This renewing of the mind corresponds to the perfecting of certain organs of the brain.

    The will is able to control the whole body. Occasionally there will be opposition from one or another of the lower organs, which will resent the control of the superior ones; but in a general way, the will has the mastery. The qualities which constitute the mind were originally a part of the image of God; but all of the powers of the human mind have been injured by the fall of man. All have been more or less weakened.

    The organs of veneration [or adoration], conscientiousness and firmness form a very powerful combination. If these qualities rule the life, the growth of the new [or transforming] mind will be rapid. Whoever has sufficient brain capacity to determine to do right and to serve God to the best of his ability, may, notwithstanding the weakness of his flesh, will to live in accordance with the Divine standard. So long as the motives of his new will are honorable, he is pure in heart; and as long as he maintains that condition, he has the assurance that he may ultimately reach perfection through obedience.

    In olden times, this purity of heart intention was as much as anyone could have. On one occasion, Joshua said, “As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” (Josh. 24:15.) In that statement the old warrior manifested purity of heart—the determination of the mind to serve the Lord. David and all the other Ancient Worthies [or heroes of faith before Christ’s death] had this determination. This was as much as they could do; and therefore, they had this testimony, that they “pleased God.”—Heb. 11:5,6,39.

    Whoever has this determination shall be blessed. He shall one day see the light of God’s countenance. If, however, for a season he should fail to maintain this standard, there would be a cloud between him and the Lord. This can be removed only by repentance and forgiveness. Then with the Psalmist he could say, “Return unto thy rest, O my soul; for the Lord hath dealt bountifully with thee.”—Psa. 116:7.

    During the Gospel Age, the people of God may have, not only this purity of heart, or conversion to the Lord, turning to Him in fullness of consecration through the precious blood of Christ, but also something more. They may have the Divine acceptance of that consecration and the begetting of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, these are the children of God in a sense peculiar to this Age. These may cry, “Abba, Father.” (Rom. 8:15.) To them, God is not merely the Controller of the Universe, but their Father.

    During the Gospel Age, the people of God may have special blessings greater than anything previously enjoyed. They have the illuminating power of the Holy Spirit, which comes through the Divine Word, the Divine providences, etc. It requires an illumination of our mental conceptions in order that we may see God. Therefore, the Church of Christ, who are begotten of the Holy Spirit, may see Him with the eyes of their understanding in a sense in which the Ancient Worthies [or heroes of faith before Christ’s death] could not.

    If we maintain our purity of heart by purity of mind, we may have the assurance of future blessings as well as of present favor and happiness. If this be our course in “the life that now is,” [1 Tim. 4:8] we have the Lord’s promise that we shall see Him in a very special sense in the life “which is to come.” [1 Tim. 4:8] We shall be changed to spirit beings and shall see Him as He is and shall share His glory. Everyone who has this hope within him purifies himself, even as the Lord is pure.—I John 3:2,3.


    ====================

    Good subject.

  • R4741 A KING SOLD HIMSELF

    [R4741 : page 14]

    A KING SOLD HIMSELF

    I KINGS 21.—FEBRUARY 26 [1911].—

    “Take heed and beware of covetousness—which is idolatry.”—Luke 12:15; Col. 3:5.

    TO King Ahab Elijah said, “Thou hast sold thyself to work evil in the sight of the Lord.” [1 Kings 21:20] The effects of the drouth gradually disappeared, but its salutary [or beneficial] lesson remained with the King and with the people to a considerable extent. The true God had some recognition. Baal’s influence was considerably broken. Queen Jezebel evidently relented concerning her threat against Elijah. He returned and founded various Schools of the Prophets in Israel, himself being the master-spirit amongst them.

    Our present lesson shows the meanness of covetousness and the awful power of a wicked woman. Ahab had two fine palaces; one of them, at Jezreel, was an “ivory” palace, but even its possession did not make the King happy. [1 Kings 22:39] He desired to attach to it a fine vineyard owned by Naboth. He sent Naboth word of his desires, offering to purchase with money or to trade for it another vineyard. Naboth, asserting his rights, declined to sell for any price.

    As a result the King was disappointed, heart-sick, vexed, pouty. He had allowed covetousness to grow in his heart. He wanted that vineyard. He was King, so it was very disrespectful of Naboth to refuse to take a good, liberal price for it. Naboth declared as his objection that the Lord’s regulations forbade that he should sell his family inheritance. Apparently it was a hopeless case and Ahab, solemn and sour, lay abed, refusing food.

    Then entered Jezebel the Queen, inquiring the cause of his sorrow. Hearing it she answered, I will give it to you. Forthwith she wrote letters to the chief men of the city, signing the letters with her husband’s seal. With brutal frankness the letters told the select men of the city what was desired of them.

    (1) They were to make a mockery of religion by keeping a fast.

    (2) They were to act hypocritically to their neighbor Naboth by giving him the most prominent place of honor at the fast.

    (3) They were to provide two worthless scamps (presumably by bribery) who, at the appropriate time in the fast would take their places near Naboth and then, with feigned religious fervor, protest against him and denounce him as a blasphemer of God and the King, corroborating each other with sworn testimony that they had heard the blasphemy with their own ears.

    (4) The penalty of blasphemy was recognized to be that of stoning and the decree was to be carried out and Naboth thus to be gotten rid of.

    If we are inclined to feel or speak strongly of the wicked course of Jezebel, as we should, let us not forget that somewhat similar practices prevail in our day. True, no one today could be stoned to death at the suggestion of a Queen in civilized lands. Nevertheless, people have been heard to express the wish that they had lived in former times, so as to have had an opportunity for stoning those whom they disliked. But take a case in point: Suppose a man conducting a successful business. Suppose covetous neighbors set up a competing business, as they would have a full right to do. But suppose, then, that one or the other, coveting the whole trade, were to attempt sharp practises in business, selling commodities at below cost, interfering with the other’s credit at the bank, or slandering the other, would not this be covetousness in action—covetousness of the same kind which King Ahab entertained? And would it not be reprehensible in God’s sight? And dare any who respect the Lord, so thoroughly neglect the Golden Rule of his Word? [Matt. 7:12]

    Another illustration: A storekeeper doing a good business was offered a certain commodity at a less price than he had been paying under a three-years’ contract. He accepted. The party who had been selling him this commodity in the past was angry, covetous of the trade. He set up a competing business and sold goods at a loss, as he could afford to do, being wealthy, until the first storekeeper failed for lack of business. Then the new store was closed down, because it had effected its work as a business assassin. It had killed Naboth. Indeed, covetousness and Jezebel methods, adapted to present-day conditions, prevail much more generally than the majority of people suppose and chiefly amongst the very rich, who have enough and to spare, but who covet their neighbors’ stocks and bonds, gold and silver, etc. If God denounced Ahab as having sold himself to iniquity, what would the Lord’s verdict be on some of the customs of our day, which has so much greater degree of light and knowledge than Ahab possessed?

    “THAT WOMAN JEZEBEL” [Rev. 2:20]

    As per instructions, word was at once sent, which came to the hands of Jezebel, saying that Naboth was dead, as per the King’s wishes. The Queen then said to her sullen lord, Arise, take possession of the vineyard of Naboth; he is dead. [1 Kings 21:15]

    The King seems to have had no qualms of conscience, but to have been in some respects as bad as the Queen, but with less courage. At all events he proceeded to take possession of the vineyard—as though he did not recognize that there is a God of Justice to whom he must ultimately account.

    Then Elijah, under Divine direction, went forth to meet the King and, by the Lord’s command said, “Hast thou killed and also taken possession? In the place where the dogs licked the blood of Naboth shall dogs lick thy blood.” [1 Kings 21:19] And this prophecy was fulfilled to the letter very shortly after. Note, however, the King’s attitude and how inclined he was, as before, to ignore the Lord and to think merely of the Prophet.

    Ahab accosted Elijah, saying, “Hast thou found me, O mine enemy?” [1 Kings 21:20a] He received the answer, “I have found thee because thou hast sold thyself to work evil in the sight of the Lord.” [1 Kings 21:20b]

    Covetousness is one of the most crying evils of our day. It is causing more heartaches and trouble of every kind, perhaps, than any other sin.


    ====================

    Good subject.

  • R4741 A DISCOURAGED PROPHET’S FLIGHT

    [R4741 : page 13]

    A DISCOURAGED PROPHET’S FLIGHT

    I KINGS 19.—FEBRUARY 19 [1911].—

    “They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength.”—Isaiah 40:31.

    SO signal a victory of Truth over error, of God over Baal, doubtless greatly encouraged Elijah, the Prophet. It was God’s victory and Elijah rejoiced on that account, and because he had, in so large degree, been the Divine agent in the matter. But soon he learned that Queen Jezebel was as implacable [or merciless] a foe as ever. She viewed the matter, not as a combat between the Almighty and Baal, but as between her prophets and Elijah. When she learned that her prophets had been slain, she was enraged and sent word to Elijah that his fate must be the same. So unexpected a turn of affairs Elijah had not anticipated. He had the courage to meet the King and to denounce the eight hundred and fifty priests of Baal [1 Kings. 18:19], but a mere message from a woman sapped his courage. He fled into the wilderness—there, strangely enough, to pray the Lord to take away the life which he had run away to protect.

    [A]Let us not forget, however, the suggestion in the previous study that the course of Elijah was intended to be typical—to foreshadow the experiences of the Church during this Gospel Age. Let us examine this feature a little further and note the type and antitype:

    Not only is Jezebel referred to in Revelation as symbolizing a corrupt Church system, inculcating false doctrines amongst the Lord’s nominal people (Ahab, her husband, as representing the civil power and Elijah typical of the saintly class of the Church), but let us also note that the time of no rain was also typical, as mentioned in the Book of Revelation. Four times is this same period of three and a half years referred to as the period in which the true saints of God were hidden from the eyes of the world in general in a wilderness condition. And during the same period there was a great drouth and famine, spiritual, amongst the people. Those three and a half years, in Revelation, are styled three and a half times, and again, twelve hundred and sixty days, and again, forty-two months.—Rev. 12:14; 12:6; 11:3; 13:5.

    In Revelation, however, these various references to three and a half years are symbolical—each day for a year—and hence signify twelve hundred and sixty years in the antitype. Many believe that those years began to count in 538 A.D. and that they ended in 1798. Those who thus understand the matter recognize the increased interest in the Bible which followed 1798 to signify the time of rain (refreshment and blessing), which for the past century has brought great enlightenment to the whole world. But, however we may apply those three and a half years, symbolical years (twelve hundred and sixty literal years), most evidently they cover the antitypical period represented by Elijah’s wilderness experiences.

    If this be a true application it implies a measure of fear and cowardice for a time on the part of God’s saintly people. As Elijah again went into hiding it would imply that the saintly ones became obscure. While they were in this wilderness condition a second time, God directed their course and taught them some important lessons, represented in Elijah’s experiences related in this lesson. He was shown a strong wind, tearing the mountains and breaking in pieces the rocks, but this was not the Lord’s manifestation of himself, but merely an illustration of power. The next lesson was an earthquake, but neither was this the Lord. Next came a fire, but not in this could Elijah fully discern the Lord. Finally came the still, small voice and wonderful message of grace and Truth. [1 Kings 19:11-13] In this Elijah recognized God as he did not recognize him in the other manifestations.

    The antitypical Elijah, God’s saintly people, are today learning to discriminate between different manifestations of Divine power through different agencies. Windy strife of words, which comes even as a hurricane, bringing devastation to the present order of Society, is not the voice of God, but the voice of humanity. The earthquake, representing a great time of social unrest, disturbance, upheaval, is not God’s message to Elijah, but, nevertheless, is a manifestation of another power which he has in the world, by which, ultimately, the present order of things will give way before the Kingdom of his dear Son. The fire, representing consumption, destruction, anarchy, is not the Lord, but merely human passions which he will permit. The Elijah class are to understand God through the still, small voice heard by the ears of their hearts—the voice of Truth, the voice of God’s Word speaking to his people today most wonderfully, yet unheard by the antitypical Ahab, Jezebel and others, intended only for the antitypical Elijah class.

    “I HAVE YET SEVEN THOUSAND” [1 Kings 19:18]

    Notwithstanding this voice, Elijah felt disconsolate and desired to die, thinking of himself as being alone consecrated to the Lord. But the Lord answered him, “I have left me seven thousand in Israel who have not bowed the knee unto Baal.” [1 Kings 19:18] Similarly today there are two classes in spiritual Israel. One class is in the wilderness condition, separate from the world. Another, a large class, is still more or less associated with and bound up in Babylon [or other such systems], although at heart they do not acknowledge any but the true God nor bow the knee to others.

    —————

    SOME GLAD, SWEET DAY

    Some day, some glad, sweet day
    We shall be like our blessed Lord
    And see him as he is.
    Soon we shall strain our
    Weary eyes no more
    To catch, beyond this earthly
    House of fettering clay,
    A gleam of heavenly glory
    From his radiant face.

    Some day, some fair, sweet day
    His loving hand will wipe
    Away our tears. His tender
    Voice will thrill our souls
    With rapture, when we
    Hear him say, “Well done,
    Dear heart, Well done,
    My joy is thine; for thee
    The victor’s crown is won.

    “Thou hast been faithful,
    Thou hast borne the cross,
    The thorns have pierced thy feet;
    But now the Night is past—
    The Day has come—bright,
    Glorious Day of endless joy and love.
    The trial time hast proved thee true,
    And thou art safe, beloved,
    In thy Father’s home.”

    O, glorious Day, for thee we long!
    We will be faithful, will the
    Burdens bear, sustained by grace Divine.
    In meek submission to thy holy will,
    Dear Lord, by faith we clasp thy hand
    As side by side we tread the Narrow Way
    And wait—for it will surely come—
    Some day, some dear, sweet day,
    O, tarry not too long!
    LIZZIE C. RAMSDELL.


    ====================

    Good subject.

  • R5900 SOME PASTORAL COUNSEL ON MARRIAGE

    [R5900 : page 154]

    SOME PASTORAL COUNSEL ON MARRIAGE

    GOD Himself performed the first marriage ceremony, by simply bringing together our first [earthly] parents, Adam and Eve. Mother Eve was already bone of Adam’s bone, and flesh of his flesh, but the two had been separated by God Himself. [Gen. 2:23] [A]They were two in body, but one in heart; for He purposed that the entire race should be born from this one pair, in order that when sin should enter and involve the whole human family, the death of one person would suffice to redeem the entire race. [B]”By man came death; by man also came the resurrection of the dead.—1 Cor. 15:21; Rom. 5:12,19.

    The Bible clearly teaches that, when the great Plan of God shall be completed by bringing Restitution to the world, this Restitution will bring humanity to that condition in which Adam was previous to the separation of the woman from him. And so we have the words of Jesus to the effect that “Those deemed worthy to obtain that Age, and that resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage, because they are like the angels.” (Luke 20:35.) In other words, in the Times of Restitution, males and females will all lose their distinctive features, and become again as Adam was in the beginning—each complete in himself—when the earth shall be filled with people. God does not design to over-fill the earth, but simply to fill it.

    But while the union of man and woman is a matter of love between themselves, the [human or earthly] Law steps in and says that there must be suitable regulations and some formal way of authorizing their union before others as witnesses, so as to avoid trouble in the future. Consequently there are certain specifications regarding licenses, etc., all of which we believe is quite proper.

    A SPECIAL MEANING IN MARRIAGE

    However, as Christian people who have the Word of God, and who as Bible students have come to some appreciation of that Word, we see in marriage a special meaning which God purposed when instituting the rite. Marriage between man and woman is a picture, or illustration, of the union to take place between Christ and the Church; and God so ordained that it should be. The Apostle [Paul] in referring to marriage as a picture, goes on to say that as Christ loved the Church and gave Himself for it, so also should men love their wives as their own body.—Ephesians 5:25-32.

    Great love is this—that a man should do for his wife what he would do for himself! [Eph. 5:28] So Christ did all this for His Body, the Church. He did even more than this—He laid down His life for us [the Church]. This should further suggest that husbands should lay down their lives for their wives, and consequently should provide not only for her food and clothes, but for her mental and moral interests as well. These should all come under the care of the husband; and a good husband should see that his wife is well cared for, even at the sacrifice of some things for himself, as circumstances might suggest.

    Then, turning to the other side of the matter, the Apostle [Paul] says that as the Church reverences her Lord, so should wives reverence their husbands. Only as mankind has caught the spirit of this Divine lesson, only in that proportion do they understand how to get the best out of life. Those who follow strictly the Lord’s arrangements get the most out of the marriage relation. The husband who loves his wife to the neglect of his own preference at times is the one who is likely to be appreciated most; and the wife who does what she can to serve her husband’s interest and is devoted to him is an illustration of what the Church does for her Lord.

    In this statement we are not undertaking to contradict the Apostle [Paul] when he says, “He that marrieth doeth well, but he that marrieth not doeth better.” (1 Corinthians 7:38.) He is not here addressing the world, but those who have devoted their lives to the Lord. If their marriage would not interfere with their consecration to the Lord, then they might marry. If it would interfere with their consecration, then for them to marry would be putting a mortgage on their lives. But there are cases in which both brethren and sisters have been benefited by marriage, not only personally, but in their relationship to the Lord and others.

    We would not be understood to mean that those who marry are going contrary to the Lord. All who desire to please the Lord should be very careful in such a matter, however; and others should not attempt to criticize those who marry. This is the liberty with which God has made us free [Similar Gal. 5:1]; and this is the liberty which we should both maintain for ourselves and grant to others.

    [C]“FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE” [வாழ்விலும், தாழ்விலும்]

    Those who marry should have in consideration the fact that they are probably not marrying a person who is perfect; for the Bible tells us that “there is none perfect, no, not one.” [Rom. 3:10] Neither one is perfect; and for one who is imperfect to ask that another shall be perfect, when neither one is or can be perfect, is manifestly wrong. However, each should endeavor to cover up his own weaknesses. There are those who are unwise in this matter. Our minds being perfect, we should live up to that high standard of mind as nearly as we can. We should hide every defect as quickly as possible, that there be no hindrance. It would be a mistake to think, when one is entering into marriage, that he [or she] is marrying somebody who is perfect. He has kept back his weakness from the other, and that one has kept back her weakness from him; and well might it be that they keep back their weaknesses throughout life.

    The married should not inquire into the things of each other’s past; for at the moment of the marriage each takes the other for better or for worse; there should be no looking back. So it is when the Lord accepts us; He does not go back to make investigations. Neither should we. If married couples should find that there are difficulties, they should not permit any one to interfere between them by endeavoring to straighten out their difficulties for them; for all such attempts make trouble. What God has joined together, let no one attempt to interfere with. Marital difficulties invariably cause a great deal of talk; and knowing this, we should be on guard lest we should do anything to increase difficulties in the lives of others. We are not even to sympathize. We are to leave them alone. Give them advice whenever they ask for it, but do not interfere. After they have married, it is for better or worse as long as they live.

    So, then, marriage is a serious matter, and should be undertaken only after serious consideration. It is a very sacred obligation. The contracting parties bind themselves for the remainder of life. All marriages would be more satisfactory if this thought were fully appreciated and followed.

    —————

    [D]”Master, speak! and make me ready,
    As Thy voice is daily heard,
    With obedience glad and steady
    Still to follow every word.
    I am listening, Lord, for Thee:
    Master, speak, speak on, to me!”


    ====================

    Good subject.

  • R4030 OFFERERS OF STRANGE FIRE

    [R4030 : page 219]

    OFFERERS OF STRANGE FIRE

    LEVITICUS 10:1-11.—AUGUST 11 [1907].—

    Golden Text:—”Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging, and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise.”—Prov. 20:1

    ABOUT a year had passed since the Israelites had left Egypt—a year of training under the direction of the Lord through his servant Moses—a year of special evidence of divine mercy and favor toward Israel. Their first-born, miraculously delivered from the tenth plague, had been accepted by the Lord as his priestly tribe, to serve the cause of the Lord and to minister to the people as his representatives. Mount Sinai’s experiences with the giving of the Law were in the past. The setting up of the Tabernacle, with its symbolical posts and curtains and furnishments, had been accomplished; the glory of the Lord had rested upon it, as indicating that he was with his people to guide in all their affairs and to bring them eventually to the promised land. The priests had been installed in office and the service of the Tabernacle started.

    At this time, while the Israelites were rejoicing in their divinely appointed religious arrangements and the priests in their special relationship to the divine program, an incident occurred which caused an awe and reverence for the holy things: a disobedience to the minute instructions of the priests brought upon the two eldest sons of Aaron condign [or deserving] punishment—instant death. Awe-stricken and fearful, Aaron and his other sons would have gladly relinquished all further service of the Tabernacle lest they themselves should similarly suffer death through some transgression of the divine commands.

    But Moses, the mediator and direct representative of God, commanded that they must not do this—they must not desert their service. He pointed out to them that the holy anointing oil was upon them, and that their entire danger lay in deserting, and that they were entirely safe so long as they heeded carefully the divine regulations. He forbade that they should even make lamentation over the deceased, since their death was a divine judgment, and to have bewailed them would have implied a rebellion against their great King, who had undoubtedly dealt justly with them. Thus at the beginning of their religious services the people of Israel were taught that they must approach the Lord with reverence and that obedience is better than sacrifice. [1 Sam. 15:22]

    WHERE JUSTICE AND MERCY MEET

    A similar lesson, we recall, was taught at the beginning of this Gospel Age, when Ananias and Sapphira were stricken dead because of false pretense in misrepresenting their gifts to the Lord and his cause. Both of these judgments seem to be severe. There is a seeming lack of mercy in both instances. We are inclined to ask, Why did not God have compassion upon these first transgressors, and merely reprove them and give them a second opportunity? We answer that the lessons taught in these two judgments were much more impressive than they could otherwise have been; [A]and as for a second chance, it is our opinion that both parties will be thus favored. [B]For instance, in the case of Ananias and Sapphira, we doubt if they ever had the full consecration of heart, or ever really came to the full knowledge of the truth which would make them responsible for their conduct and liable to the Second Death. [C]Our surmise is that they were well-intentioned, but not begotten of the holy Spirit, and that the Lord made an illustration of them without special injury to themselves, but for the advantage of his consecrated people at that time and ever since, illustrating the facts that the Lord knoweth them that are his, that nothing is hidden from his sight, and that it is in vain that any would attempt to deceive him.

    [D]Similarly we have no thought that the two sons of Aaron passed into the Second Death. Theirs was only a typical anointing to the typical priesthood, and their death we similarly understand to be typical, an illustration of some of the antitypical priests who will perish from the priesthood because of disobedience to the divine direction. As for Nadab and Abihu, our supposition is that in the resurrection morning they will be amongst the great world of mankind who will come forth unto a resurrection by judgments—by disciplines. By disobedience they merited the loss of the present life, and God made use of the circumstances to give a lesson to the people of that time that would hinder them from being careless in the handling of holy things, to the intent that the types and shadows of their dispensation might be handed down to us in their purity, [E]and as a type or illustration to us of the Royal Priesthood respecting two classes amongst us represented by these two priests.

    TWO CLASSES REPRESENTED BY NADAB AND ABIHU

    Since the priests, the Tabernacle and all the services connected were particular types, foreshadowings of higher and better things, it follows that the death of these two sons of Aaron must have a typical signification. They must typify persons who lose their standing in the antitypical priesthood, some who fail to make their calling and election sure, some who were originally accepted and anointed as members of the Body of the great High Priest, but who lose that glorious position because of failure to follow the divine directions. The Scriptures tell us of three ultimate divisions of those originally accepted of the Lord as members of the Body of Christ and anointed with the holy Spirit.

    (1) The faithful, who will come off more than conquerors [F]and constitute the Very Elect, the Royal Priesthood of the Millennial Age.

    (2) A “great company, whose number is known to no man” [Rev. 7:9]—who, failing to be of the little flock, rejected from the priestly office, but nevertheless refusing to deny the Lord, will ultimately constitute the servants of Christ in glory, the antitypical Levites.

    (3) Another class of the consecrated who will fail to appreciate and properly use the Lord’s favors, and under the tests prove entirely unworthy of eternal life, and fall into the hands of the living God for utter destruction in the Second Death.

    If an attempt were made to indicate these three classes amongst the sons of Aaron by proportionate numbers it would apparently have necessitated one of the five representing the little flock, three of the five representing the “great company,” and the other one to represent those who would go into the Second Death. But such an illustration was not made and would not have been consistent with the divine plan, for it evidently was not intended to indicate in any manner what proportion would go into the Second Death nor what proportion would fail of the priesthood and go into the “great company.” [G]On the other hand, to suppose that both the priests who died typified those who would go into the Second Death would imply that two-fifths of all the consecrated would perish. Besides, it would leave the type incomplete in that it would make no showing of the “great company,” who consecrated and were accepted as priests, but who failed to prove faithful to the end, failed to become members of the Royal Priesthood of the Kingdom.

    [H]It is for these reasons that we understand the two priests set before us in this lesson to represent the two classes who will fail to make their calling and election sure as members of the Body of the great High Priest of glory. Nadab we understand to represent those who will fall from the priestly office to the Levitical, as members of the “great company.” In allowing one priest to represent each of these classes nothing is indicated respecting the proportionate numbers of either, but simply the fact that there will be two classes who will fail of the grace of God after they have been anointed with the holy anointing oil for membership in the Royal Priesthood.

    It seems to us consistent to thus represent by one person each two classes, whose numbers are not definitely fixed by the divine decree, but merely composed of those who fail to give heed and to rightly use their blessings and opportunities. The names of these two sons who died may be construed in harmony with these suggestions. Nadab signifies spontaneous, self-acting, and suggests to us the class who will go into the Second Death because of their self-will—their failure to hold the Head. As for the one who we believe represented the “great company,” his name, Abihu, signifies son of God. This, too, seems appropriate. The “great company,” like the little flock, are begotten of the holy Spirit and will be born of the Spirit—sons of God on a spirit plane, though not on the divine plane. They are thus, as well as the little flock, differentiated from the remainder of mankind, who will be recognized as the sons of Christ—receiving their lives by restitution from him who bought them with his precious blood.

    OFFERING STRANGE FIRE—NOT COMMANDED

    The crime for which the two sons of Aaron died is described in the same terms yet not with particularity. We do not know whether their transgression consisted in taking an improper kind of incense or in failing to take fire from the altar or burning the incense in the wrong place—perhaps in the court instead of the holy—or whether it may have been the proper incense with the proper fire and in the proper place at the wrong time; nor can we know that both of the offending priests did exactly the same thing.

    Some have surmised that the error was in respect to attempting to enter the Most Holy on the Day of Atonement, when the High Priest alone was permitted to enter with the blood of the sin-offering. The lesson to the remaining priests in the type was the necessity for greater carefulness, greater reverence for the Lord and the particular directions by which they might be his servants and come into his presence and be his ministers to the people. The lesson to us, the antitypical priesthood, would be a similar one—that obedience is better than sacrifice, and that the sacrifices we offer in order to be acceptable must be presented in harmony with the divine will, and that any other procedure on our part will cause the loss of our membership in the Royal Priesthood.

    There is a similarity as well as a difference between the errors of those who will constitute the “Great Company” and the errors of those of the consecrated who will be condemned to the Second Death. Their errors are the same in that they fail to sufficiently respect the stipulations of the divine arrangement. Both fail to offer the kind of incense that the Lord directed—self-sacrifice and praise to him, with which sacrifice God is well pleased. (Heb. 13:15,16.) The difference, however, between those who will constitute the “Great Company” and those of this age who will die the Second Death is that the latter ignore Christ and the merit of his sacrifice on their behalf, counting his blood a common thing, and doing despite to the favor brought to them thereby. [Similar Heb. 10:29] The other class escape the Second Death and become the “Great Company,” not because they have offered proper incense unto the Lord, but because they do not deny, do not reject, but maintain their hold upon the foundations of their faith, the merit of Christ’s sacrifice on their behalf.

    “SHE MADE ALL NATIONS DRUNK” [Similar Rev. 14:8]

    The fact that immediately after this narrative of the death of Nadab and Abihu the command was given to Aaron and his sons that they should drink no wine nor strong drink, etc., gives some ground for the supposition that the two sons who perished had been somewhat intoxicated, or at least stupefied through strong drink, and that thus their senses were more or less beclouded in respect to the commands of the Lord concerning the offering of incense. This putting away of intoxicants is described as putting a difference between the holy and the common, between the clean and the unclean.

    There is no doubt whatever that literal intoxicants were referred to by our Lord in this command, but applying it antitypically we find that a different kind of intoxicants is likely to affect the antitypical priests. We agree, of course, that the words of the Apostle [Paul] are applicable to all of the Royal Priesthood, “Be not drunk with wine wherein is excess, but be ye filled with the Spirit.” [Eph. 5:18] We cannot, however, apply the matter literally to the Royal Priesthood and say that no one who is connected with the antitypical Tabernacle and its services could taste of wine without a violation of the divine law; because our great High Priest himself partook of wine. In seeking, therefore, for the antitypical significations of the command that they should use neither wine nor strong drink, we find it intimated in the declaration of Revelation that Great Babylon made all nations drunk with the wine of her false doctrine and confusion of spiritual and political interests.

    Undoubtedly the confusion of doctrine which prevails is to some extent responsible for the failure of the “great company” class to offer acceptable incense. As we get rid of the confusion of mind introduced by the false doctrines of the “dark ages”—the “doctrines of devils” [1 Tim. 4:1] as the Apostle [Paul] describes them—we find that our clearer thoughts are indeed a great advantage to us in respect to a proper understanding of what would be pleasing and acceptable to the Lord our God as our sacrifices or incense before him. Intoxicated with the errors of the past, many of us doubtless offer to the Lord “strange fire,” strange incense, such as he has not commanded. To continue so to do would seem to imply that we would ultimately be amongst those who would fail to reach the glorious priesthood. Most heartily, therefore, do we thank the Lord that we are getting sobered up—that to us is returning through the nutriment of his Word the spirit of a sound mind, that more and more we are coming to comprehend with all saints the lengths and breadths and heights and depths of his love [Eph. 3:18], and thus are the better qualified day by day to know the good, the acceptable, the perfect will of God [Rom. 12:2], and to make our offerings in harmony therewith.

    WHOSOEVER IS DECEIVED BY WINE IS NOT WISE [Prov. 20:1b]

    While the “Royal Priests” are in more danger from the symbolic wine than from the natural, and hence need to be more on guard against it, nevertheless an occasional reminder of the dangers that lurk in the literal wine is safe. It is especially well that all see clearly the value of example, particularly upon the young. And the better the Christian and the greater his knowledge of God’s Word, the greater his influence either for good or evil. Hence the force of the Apostle [Peter]’s words, “What manner of persons ought we to be?” [2 Pet. 3:11] On this phase of the subject we content ourself with quotations from the pens of others, as follows:—

    Prof. Marcus Dods says of College athletics:—”Trainers for athletics act according to St. Paul’s rule, ‘Every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things.’ [1 Cor. 9:25] Not only during the contest, but during the long preparation for it. The one in training must not touch cigarettes or liquor. The little indulgences which some men allow themselves he must forego. Not once will he break the trainer’s rules, for he knows that some competitors will refrain from even that once, and gain strength while he is losing it. He is proud of his little hardships and fatigues and privations, and counts it a point of honor scrupulously to abstain from anything which might in the slightest degree diminish his chances of success.”

    Coleman in the Independent says:—”A number of gentlemen in the State of New York came together to value certain parcels of land which were to be offered at public sale. They agreed unanimously upon the sum they were worth; but upon the day of the sale the owner cunningly treated them to alcoholic drinks, and one of them bid and actually paid four times as much for the property as he or any other man in his right senses thought it worth. A temperance man, having some standing timber to be disposed of at public sale, decided that he would not furnish alcoholic liquors to the bidders, as was the custom in that day. The auctioneer replied: ‘I am sorry, for you will lose a great deal of money. I know how it works, for after the men have been drinking the trees look much larger to them than they did before.’ A vendue master in Connecticut said: ‘I have often in this way got more than ten times the value of the drinks I have furnished.’ Horse jockeys, gamblers, thieves, wholesale merchants and commercial travelers often furnish alcoholic drinks for the same purpose.”

    “Doctor Arnot, the famous Scotch preacher, once used this striking illustration on the total abstinence question: There are plenty of men, and women, too, who proudly say, ‘I am not obliged to sign away my liberty in order to keep on the safe side.’ To such people Dr. Arnot says: ‘True, you are not obliged; but here is a river we have to cross. It is broad, and deep, and rapid; whoever falls into it is sure to be drowned. Here is a narrow footbridge, a single timber extending across. He who is lithe of limb and steady of brain and nerve, may skip over it in safety. Yonder is a broad, strong bridge. Its foundations are solid rock, and its passages are wide. All may cross it in perfect safety—the aged and feeble, the young and gay, the tottering wee ones—there is no danger there. “Now,” you say, “I am not obliged to go yonder. Let them go there who cannot walk this timber.” True, true, you are not obliged; but we know that if we cross that timber, though we may go safely, many others who will attempt to follow us will surely perish, and we feel better to go by the bridge! Walking a narrow footbridge over a raging torrent is risky business, but it is safety itself compared with tampering with strong drink.’”


    ====================

    Good subject.

  • R1836 THE OFFERING OF STRANGE FIRE

    [R1836 : page 158]

    THE OFFERING OF STRANGE FIRE.

    —JULY 21 [1895].—LEV. 10:1-11.—

    Golden Text—”Do not drink wine nor strong drink, thou, nor thy sons with thee.”—Verse 9. [Lev. 10:9]

    THE text of this lesson introduces to us the typical religious service of the Tabernacle in the wilderness, instituted by God in connection with the giving of the law to Israel. *(*See TABERNACLE SHADOWS.)

    The tabernacle, with all its appointments and service, is of special interest to Christians, not merely as a matter of Jewish history, but because, both in its construction and in its service, it was typical of spiritual things in store for the Gospel Church. The plan and materials of its construction, every board and curtain, every article of its furniture, and the colors and designs of its ornamentation, as well as its priesthood, its sacrifices and all its forms and ceremonies, were full of significance as “shadows of heavenly things,” [Similar Heb. 8:5] of the divine plan of redemption and reconciliation through Christ, which began to be wrought [or formed] out in Christ at his first advent, has been gradually working out all through the Gospel age and will be completed in the Millennial age.

    There are three points to which special attention is called in this lesson; viz, (1) The sanctification or setting apart of Aaron and his four sons to the priesthood; (2) The abuse of the office on the part of two of the sons, and (3) The penalty which followed. While these things would have but small interest to us as mere matters of history, they are seen to be of immense importance to all Christians, when their typical significance is considered.

    The High Priest, Aaron, and the under or subordinate priests, his sons, in their typical official capacity, represented Christ Jesus and his Church during the Gospel age, whose chief duty during this age is to offer the acceptable sacrifices of this antitypical day of atonement, as represented in the type. (Heb. 9:22,23.) [A]It should be observed that the number of priests, five, in comparison with the hosts of Israel, who represented the whole world, was very small. So, in the antitype, it is but a “little flock” (Luke 12:32); and they are chosen for their office for the purpose, not of condemning, but of serving and blessing the world, as shown in the type and indicated by the term priesthood.

    It is a great honor now, as it was then in the type, to be called to this high office of service with Christ our Lord and Head, to be, with him, a royal priesthood, a holy nation a peculiar people [Similar 1 Pet. 2:9]; but as such let us not forget that we are to be a people zealous of good works [Similar Titus 2:14]—a people cleansed from sin, as symbolized by the washing and the clean white linen robes of the typical priesthood. We must by faith appropriate the robe of Christ’s righteousness; and then, as the typical priesthood was anointed with the holy anointing oil, so must we be anointed with the holy spirit, and thereafter fully submit ourselves to the leading of the holy spirit of God, which speaks to us in no uncertain tones through his precious Word.

    While it is a great privilege and honor to be called to the priesthood, and to be robed and anointed for its service, the typical incident of this lesson conveys to us a solemn warning of responsibility. Nadab and Abihu, the two eldest sons of Aaron, without authority presumed to offer incense before the Lord. [B]This duty was appointed to Aaron only. [Exo. 30:7-8] It was to be performed in a particular way, and only on the day of atonement, and with fire taken from the altar of sacrifice. (Lev. 16:2,11-13.) [C]In offering the incense these two members of the priesthood took upon themselves to do what they were not commanded to do, and also in a time and manner unauthorized, taking the fire also from some other source than the altar of sacrifice. Their burning incense was therefore called “strange fire”—unauthorized. Their sin was a presumptuous sin, and the penalty was death. As immediately following the record (verses 9-11) [Lev. 10:9-11], there is the prohibition of wine or strong drink to the priests in the service of the tabernacle, the intimation [or rather the inference] seems to be that the two offenders were to some extent under such influence when they offered the “strange fire”—strange or unacceptable incense.

    What is the lesson here shadowed forth for the antitypical priesthood, the truly consecrated and anointed Church of Christ? The special lesson to all such is, Beware of presumptuous sins! The offering of incense by Aaron, the typical High Priest, and made by fire from the altar of sacrifice, represented the sweet odor unto God of the perfect obedience of Christ, our great High Priest, even when tried in the fires of the altar of sacrifice. As thus on the day of atonement, after the offering of the sin-offering, Aaron burned the incense in the holy place before the Lord, so Christ, after offering his great sacrifice for us, entered into heaven itself with the sweet incense of his perfect obedience, and his sacrifice was therefore acceptable to God on our behalf. (Heb. 9:24; Rev. 8:3.) And as the offering of the sacrifice with the incense was on behalf of the under-priests and of all Israel as well, so the offering of Christ is for the priesthood, the Church, as well as for the whole world. (1 John 2:2.) True, we are to be laid with him [or rather after him] on the altar of sacrifice; but our sacrifice would avail nothing were it not for his sacrifice and the sweet odor of his personal merit ascending God with our prayers for a share in his meritorious covering.—Rev. 8:3.

    We, the Church, the antitypical under-priests, must therefore beware of the presumptuous sin of offering strange fire, strange incense, before the Lord, of presuming to approach God in our own righteousness. Only in acknowledgement of the sweet savor of Christ’s righteousness, applied to us by faith in his blood, are we acceptable with God. Another lesson is that we should pay our vows unto the Most High with scrupulous exactness, and, to this end, keep the head clear and the heart right by obediently abstaining from the intoxicating spirit of the world; but “Be ye filled with the spirit”—the spirit of obedience and of a sound mind. (Psa. 19:13; Eph. 5:17,18; 2 Tim. 1:7.) In so doing we shall not be tempted to offer strange fire before the Lord, but will humbly trust in the acceptable incense of Christ our Redeemer, and ever observe a well defined line between the holy and the unholy, the clean and the unclean.—Lev. 10:9-11.

    The displeasure of the Lord against those who presume to approach him with “strange fire”—knowing that they are not coming in his appointed way—is indicated, and the penalty illustrated, in the fate of the two sons of Aaron. (Verse 2.) [Lev. 10:2] “And there went out a fire from the Lord [D](probably a lightning stroke) and devoured them, and they died before the Lord. Then Moses said unto Aaron (in explanation of the summary judgment), This is what the Lord hath spoken, saying, I will be sanctified in them that come nigh me, and before all the people I will be glorified. And Aaron held his peace.”—Verse 3. [Lev. 10:3]

    The destruction of the two presumptuous priests who thus attempted to present themselves before the Lord in other than his appointed way illustrates the teaching of the Lord and the apostles that the second death will be that “sorer punishment” [Heb. 10:29] which those of the antitypical priesthood will incur who attempt to appear before the Lord and to offer strange fire—strange incense which he did not authorize and cannot approve. The righteousness of Christ is the only acceptable incense; and we dare not come in our own. That we have been called to the priesthood and anointed with the holy anointing oil (the holy spirit) is no guarantee that we shall retain that office if we do despite unto the spirit of favor, despise God’s appointed way, and so forfeit his approval. (Heb. 10:29,30.) [E]Nor is the penalty indicated merely the forfeiture of the official honor; but it is death, the second death, from which there shall be no awakening. Let us not lose sight of the fact that the Lord has declared that he will be sanctified, that his name shall be honored before the people in those whom he owns as his consecrated priests. And those taking upon themselves the vows of the priesthood and receiving the divine anointing, who afterward at heart despise the Lord’s appointments and ignore their covenant relationship with him, have no other hope than that indicated in the death of the two typical priests who offered strange fire.

    “And Aaron held his peace.” [Lev. 10:3b] In the office of high priest, Aaron was a type of Christ, the High Priest of our profession, who will make no intercession for the recovery of those who sin unto death. His silence approves the judgment of God.

    And Moses called the relatives of the two dead priests and said unto them, “Come near, carry your brethren from before the sanctuary out of the camp. So they went near and carried them in their coats out of the camp, as Moses had said. And Moses said unto Aaron and unto Eleazer and unto Ithamar, his sons, Uncover not your heads; neither rend your clothes, lest ye die, and lest wrath come upon all the people; but let your brethren, the whole house of Israel, bewail the burning which the Lord hath kindled (bewail the fact that these had so incurred the wrath of God). And ye shall not go out from the door of the tabernacle of the congregation (—ye shall not leave the holy place to follow after and lament the dead ones), lest ye (also) die; for the anointing oil of the Lord is upon you (—i.e., you are consecrated to full submission and obedience to the will of God). And they did according to the word of Moses”—the representative of God.—Verses 4-7 [Lev. 10:4-7]. So all who remain loyal to God will approve his righteous judgments. Nor will they leave the holy place of fellowship and communion with God to follow those spiritually dead into the outer darkness. And all who have the spirit of God will show by their conduct that, while they approve God’s righteous sentence, they feel as he does about it, when he says, “As I live, I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth.”—Ezek. 33:11.

    It is a fact worthy of notice that one-half of those called and consecrated to the typical priesthood [2 out of 4 sons of Aaron] (as under-priests, representing the consecrated of this age) forfeited their lives by offering the strange fire. [F]If this proportion is typical of a similar loss amongst the called and consecrated of this age, it bids us be all the more upon our guard to make our calling and election sure.

    While the death penalty was promptly visited upon the erring typical priests we must not forget that theirs was not the “sorer punishment” [Heb. 10:29]—the second death—due to a violation of the New Covenant obligations by the antitypical priesthood. They forfeited only the present life, or rather the few more years they might otherwise have lived. In the resurrection-day they also will come forth to trial for everlasting life under the favorable circumstances of Christ’s glorious reign.

    ====================

    Good subject.